I’ve been meaning to drive down to take pictures of just what’s out there for the longest time. But laziness mostly got in my way. I remember back in the day when I first got my camera, I would just take my car and go exploring O.C. I would just drive down to the Tustin marketplace to take pictures of the signs at night, take a cruise down random parks to try to find bugs. Then it all sort of stopped. I still like taking pictures, but the exploration and the drive to do it as a hobby simply stopped.
Today I told Chrissie I think I’ll just drive down to the beach and take some photos. I really can’t remember the last time I just wanted to go out and take pictures for the sake of doing it. So I’m really glad i got the chance to see the sun setting. It was really fun and liberating to just drive down PCH, park and walk around with a camera to take pictures.

The shot below I walked a little deeper into the waves to take a picture of this rock as the sun was setting. I brought along three lenses in a bag, and I’ve decided next time that’s a big mistake. I’ll just take one and not think about changing anything. I was more worried about the bag getting wet from the waves than the camera! The bag nor the lenses I had inside were not weather sealed, so it actually held me back. I was literally waste deep in water for this shot.

And to just explore nature and her little quirks. For instance this rock has a little target written on it. I should of kept it as a keepsake, but it really was there. It wasn’t some kid drawing on the rock with a marker.

As the sun was finally setting, I started to focus my attention the rocks. I was very curious about the reflections of the water. I knew I would have about 20-30 minutes of light left to do anything. So I kept on trying to take the reflection shots, but realized the sky didn’t have any clouds today. So there really wasn nothing to reflect.

But it was a very fun little excursion. I think the last time I was at this beach was when my friend Neil and I woke are butts up at 5AM to drive out to the beach to try to get a picture of the sunrise. Ahhh… maybe I’ll do that next time.

Today, In the mail, I received my Canon EC-S focusing screen. What you ask? Is an Ec-S focusing screen? Well the marketing geniuses at Canon label’s its features as:

• Focusing screen features super precision matte
• Essential for manual focusing shots
• Makes it easy to determine the precise point of the sharpest focus

In laymens terms, it is essentially a 40 dollar piece of plastic, no larger than the size of a quarter, that allows geeky photographers to take pictures using old ass lenses that can’t auto-focus( or super crazy macro lenses ).

Which begs the question. “What idiot would go and waste $40 dollars on a tiny piece of plastic?” ….As the room goes silent, only one idiot raises his hand. Yes, that idiot, would be none other than yours truly.

Installation was pretty straight forward. You open up your camera and poke at the top to release the focusing screen housing.

Just be very careful to try to perform this action in a relatively dust free environment, and be sure to clean your hands. Otherwise, bad things will happen to your sensor. You use the handy dandy tool that comes with the Ec-S screen to take the original focusing screen out, and replace it with the shiny new focusing screen.

Snap the housing back in place, and plop a lens back onto your camera. Note: The EC-S is can technically only be used on a 1DIIN, 1DIII, 1DsIII and a few higher end film bodies from Canon. The reason is you need to go into the custom functions of the camera and inform it that you are using the Ec-S screen so that the light meter can recalibrate itself to the darker screen. Darker screen you say? Yes…once installed you will lose 1-stop of light, therefore you will need fast glass to even use this. lenses of 2.8 aperture or wider is ideal. (But I’ll get to my conclusions later).

So after I installed this wondrous new focusing screen (note the sarcasm), I immediately put on in my macro lens and attempted to take a picture (Yes I shot that using manual focus).

And Wow…I must admit. There is a world of difference (Again, note the sarcasm). It is then that I finally realized the futility of my new expensive piece of plastic. Manual focusing, and thus, manual focus lenses are really supposed to be used by people who could actually SEE! Yes, people with don’t wear ginormous bottle cap glasses such as myself. People with better vision who could…for lack of a better term….Actually manually focus! Blind people, such as myself rely on newfangled computers to determine focus. Though I wonder if it means that video camera operators must have good or near perfect vision, because most higher end cameras are all fully manual focus only?

So, to conclude my review, all kidding aside. I think there is about a 15% to 20% increase in the clarity of the image for manual focusing. The Ec-S screen as neat as it is, may not be the most practical purchase because newer camera bodies these days offer live view. That is, it allow you to visually see what you are focusing on via the LCD with super precision. You can Optically zoom 10x and focus precisely. Even blind people like me can use live view to focus accurately. New technology has made this EC-S screen obsolete, in my opinion. I’ll keep the new ec-s on my camera for a bit to see how it performs during daylight conditions. My 1DII does not have live view, so I may decide to keep it. However, I have a sneaking suspicion it will go back into the box eventually, and perhaps I’ll put it up for sale for someone else to try =)

I’ve done something this morning that I’m ashamed to say haven’t done since High School (Well, aside from the one year I volunteered at a food bank for Thanksgiving). But I’ve essentially done nothing for the past 12 years.

There are many underlying reasons why one would take up the mantle to help out in a cause that’s greater than yourself. Some volunteer for a cause because they’ve lost loved ones. Some do it to pad their resumes or an gasp…some do it for truly altruistic purposes (However I think those people are more rare). My reason is entirely a selfish one. The recent discovery brain cancer in my dad was the catalyst. I make a good living, am healthy, have been blessed with great family and friends. I should at least make an effort to help out where I can to build good karma. There were many nice people who helped my father during his stay an the hospital. The theory is to try to do good, and in doing so, hopefully good will come back to me (in the form of good health for my dad). I don’t consider it as paying a debt, it’s more akin to paying it forward (Yes just like that movie with Haley Joel Osment).

Initially, I really wanted to volunteer for cancer or aids events, but they were all booked up in terms of volunteers. Luckily, the The National Multiple Sclerosis Society. still needed volunteers! I must admit, it was miserable to wake up at 5:30am, but once I got there, it was all good. I didn’t volunteer in a booth or to direct traffic. I’m not particularly good at manual labor (As my wife can attest), so naturally I opted to do what I do best. Which is taking pictures! Hopefully they’ll be able to use them in their marketing campaign to generate more funds and awareness for Multiple Sclerosis, which affects 2.1 million people.

I didn’t realize until after the fact, that this guy was wearing an SC shirt and giving me the ‘fight on’ symbol. I have a pretty myopic view from behind a 200mm lens, and things were going at a fairly fast paced, so haha I swear I didn’t single this guy out because he came from my alma mater!

This gentleman pretty much single-handedly raised almost 40 thousand dollars for the cause.

I took this opportunity to practice my panning technique. Essentially you slow the lens down, and pan with the subject to simulate movement. By panning, you keep up with the subject, and they will in theory be in ‘more’ focus than the background. So These were roughly at 1/15th of a second at F22. It takes a lot of practice to master, and I haven’t really had opportunities to try this technique until today!

Shamless plugs. Yeah it was interesting, they had a shot wish list, and sponsors were on top of the list. Which is understandable, they want the sponsors to be recognized so they would continue their sponsorships for future events. I tried shooting them in a way where it wasn’t blatantly obvious that I’m doing a shameless plug. It was an amusing challenge.

Ok this one is shameless. haha!

Over all I had a fantastic time. I wouldn’t mind having other volunteer opportunities. I think it would be interesting to go to retirement homes to take pictures of elderly people. Everyone wants to be loved or get some form attention. There’s nothing like a camera being aimed at you to make you feel somewhat important or recognized. Fleeting as it may appear, who knows, a single smile can do wonders.

There were other photogs at this event. It was interesting to see how other people worked. They were all clumped towards the starting line, or asked groups to say hi and cheer. The latter was never really my style so i chose to roam around. I think I clumped with a a few of them in front of the starting line, before I realized it was foolish. Why take the same shot as the guy next to you? To be unique, or get a different perspective. Be where other people aren’t! So lol, I walked down the street and got free reign of the street shots.

Now on to the boring details that boys care about!

I Used 2 cameras and (shockingly only brought two lenses). 1DMKIII and 1DMKII, with a 70-200IS, and a sigma 14mm. I didn’t even bother with a backpack! Just a satchel for snackies, and memory cards.
I’ve confirmed that I do indeed like wide angles, and they do have their purpose but the flare on this sigma makes it rather annoying, and I think I’m going to replace the lens as soon as I get enough funds for a Canon 14mm MKII. Since it began uber early, I gambled that I would have enough light to shoot. Clearly I would of lost, if it wasn’t for the ISO 2000 and above capabilities of the MKIII. But it was chilly, but these two bodies are built like tanks. I shot int he pouring rain once with them, so It was good to have peace of mind that the moisture in the air wouldn’t hurt the gear.

All the action shots were done in AI Focus. In hindsight, I should of brought my 200mm prime. The 70-200 is a fine lens, but for bikes that move quickly, focusing is essential, and since the zoom lens is a ad large, it is a bit slow to focus. Don’t get me wrong, it’s faster than the average bear, but nowhere near as fast as I need it to be. I’ve missed a few crucial shots because it couldn’t keep up.
The full Sets are on my Flickr account under the Natioal MS society Bike_Ride Collection.

Well, we took my dad to the ER this past Sunday. He lost motion/movement in his left extremities, so we thought it was just weak. Well, to be prudent, we just took him to the ER. Rather be safe than sorry. Lately he was complaining about his left eye, vision blurriness, etc. Well, once again, I guess it was a good call. Though thankfully this time, we got him in on his own volition, rather than rushing him in. Turns out after a few CAT scans and MRI’s, there are three tumors in his brain. One 3 centimeters, and the other two are rather small. I just met with the Dr tonight, and he’s going to go over my dad’s file and discuss options with the family tomorrow.

I don’t know, I think this time around, it still definitely sucks, but the sting isn’t as sharp as it was the first and second time around. The fact that he was literally at death’s doorstep, 9 months back was frightening and I think I mentally prepared for it (as much as I can). These extra 9 months has been fantastic, he was eating again, even went for walks. And driving my mom batty, which is always a good indicator of health. So we’re hopeful, and I’m waiting to see what the Dr’s think. Whether or not we should go for surgery, or rounds of chemo/radiation to stave off the bats in his belfry.

But yeah today, I met with the Dr. and as he was talking, I was thinking to myself. Wow, what a wonderful guy. He works clinic until 6, heads home to take care of some errands, then goes back to work at around 8 or 9 to do rounds in the hospital and reads files and cases. I mean, he has no life, and I think that’s a sign of a fantastic Dr. Just someone who genuinely has passion and cares. I almost feel guilty, as I want to bring that passion back into my work.

But I’ve been going to see him every day after work. Bringing a little recorder to record tidbits of conversations, and giving him plenty of kisses and love. So funny, I guess the tumors are affecting his memory. Some things he’ll lose, but others he’ll remember with such clarity. He asked me to re-write a song that I wrote when I was in the 2nd or third grade. Something about a mountain in the middle of the road…and the teacher gave me low marks because she thought it was impossible to have a mountain in the middle of the road. haha, I don’t even remember writing this, but I’m sure I have. Because it’s something I would do. So I guess I’ll try to re-write that song for him! =)

Well, this was the first real instance where I had to take a substantial amount of gear onto an airplane. I was a tad worried about FAA rules, but surprisingly, my camera bag got past security quicker than my regular backpack, which happened to be packing a PSP. As those of you know, I’m a camera bag whore, but when it comes to a single bag that can hold (most) of what I need, it’s the Expedition 7. Now for those of you who clicked the link, you may be asking yourself, “Gee, that bag sure looks big and heavy”. Well, yes…yes it is. It’s big, bulky, heavy, and since I’m short, I look like a complete idiot carrying a backpack that’s twice my size. And…to top that off, since the good manufacturers and marketers of Tamrac were so kind enough to plaster their name all over the place, it does have an additional feature of ‘please steal this bag’ written all over it. So I guess my review of the bag for any long term travel would be…. travel with less equipment. But in the event you can’t…it may be the way to go.
The Bag is weather resistant, but I would still feel uneasy during a good heavy rain.

Off to the wedding! San Francisco, is actually a very very very (yes I wrote that three times) beautiful. If anything, it has a lot of character. And the one thing I regret not being able to do, but will definitely get to it next time, would be to get landscape shots of the downtown skyline, and the golden gate proper.

Started the morning by going to two destinations. One was the Palace Of Fine Arts. For those of you unfamiliar with that name, it looks sorta like this:

Yes, when I found out I was going to shoot there, I nearly wet myself, and my mind raced with a thousand different ideas. But I’ve only been there once, and the only other time I’ve seen it was during the movie “The Rock”, with Sean Connery. So needless to say I was trying to recall those scenes with the benches, and tailor my shots to that. When I got there, it was a different story. We only had time for a few locations, and it was kind of muddy, so we kept to the front. So rule #1. No matter what you try to plan or envision, don’t worry. Life never works that way, and you’ll always end up with something else. Plan too much, and you’re gonna set yourself up for failure. At least when it comes to more dynamic events, like weddings (that doesn’t quite apply to contrived shots, where planning is essential). But they really can’t escape Murphy’s Law.

As you can see Mitch, the groom is in full military (navy) regalia…and needless to say, his outfit is more white than the bride’s. I know I harped on a student earlier this much and said, when the dress or outfit is too reflective, always stop down. This way it’s easier to bring out details in a slightly darker image, than to lose the information entirely in an over exposed image. Ahhh…if only I heeded my own advice. I tried to get them into the shade as much as possible, but wow, there were some embarrassing overexposed shots in there. Shhhhh…. Rule #2. “A good photographer never shows’ his crappy photos”. (Technically this should be rule #0, it’s kinda implied).

The 2nd location is a a park called Crissy Fields. It over-looks a little bridge called “The Golden Gate Bridge”. Well there were 2 problems that I could visibly see. A) The bridge was surrounded by haze. B) It was super bright, and I had no shade to speak of to block the harsh shadows. Rule #2. Don’t panic. (I think this was the title of a Douglas Adams Book). If you can’t alter your environment to your favor…screw it. Live with the consequences and ask for forgiveness later. Absolution can sometimes be found during post process (Note the sometimes). But never panic. Panicking is for beginners….and ooh do people smell fear and insecurity a mile away.

Which does segway nicely to Rule #3. People like are like sheep. They want to be led into some direction. Despite what anyone says, you are in control, you dictate the shot, to some extent the pose, mood, and general art direction. And it’s nice that someone can take control of the situation, especially since the couple generally has a ton of other things on their mind that day. The least of which should be, how or where should I stand during a photoshoot). So even if you don’t know what you’re doing… make believe you know what you’re doing. Truth be told, half of the time I’m in la la land. I’m worried about what settings to use, lighting, i kinda give the stance, pose, and other things a fraction of a thought. That’s where assistants do help out tremendously. They help worry about the little details that I often overlook, but shouldn’t. Like…oh the flower on your lapel is slightly crooked. Once in awhile I’ll get to that, but generally…trust me, I have way too much other crap going on in that little head of mine to worry about the small details…But as that cliche saying goes. “The devil…is in the details”. So yes, there’s plenty of things for me to improve on.

Note the squint in the eyes. and nasty shadows.

This one above isn’t one of my best work, (I’ve violated rule #1, but it’s to prove an interesting point). Always know, or at least try to know what you’re getting into, and prepare accordingly. I knew I was going to be in the sun with no assistant to hold a reflector to mitigate shadows. So, I brought along an external flash for fill. I knew it was going to be sunny as hell. So, I did bring along a .6 neutral density filter In other words, glorified sunglasses for my lens. This helps me able to achieve lower apertures in bright sunlight without having to worry about the 1/8000th of a second limitation on shutter speed. As you can see, the flash (kind of helped) fill in the frame. Both of them wearing white did throw it off, and it’s slightly clipped in some parts, but as a whole, it’s not bad.

The Art of Black and White
So I often get asked when or why do I convert something to Black and White. Ok fine, I don’t ‘often’ get asked anything, but I do sometimes like to make myself feel important so I thought I suppose it’s only appropriate I used that sentence. Anyways, I digress. So…Onto B&W. I first used B&W as a crutch. When I totally missed the exposure, or the colors are so out of whacked I have no choice but to convert over to a single 2 tone. But lately as I grew in experience, I convert to B&W for an entirely different reason. And that is, whenever I feel like I want color to not distract the viewer from the image. What do I mean by that? Well, take the image below for instance. It in essence is a boy and his mother. More accurately, a boy, carrying holding on to his mother’s dess.
If I kept it in color, people would notice the green foliage they’re walking by, or the strange brown and blue windows that are in the entry way. or perhaps maybe even the tan stone/tile blocks they were walking on. Well, in the absence of any color information, the brain tends to be less inundated with extra information, and focus moreso on that is important….The subject…. So that does cross my mind whenever I decide to convert something over from color to B&W. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that I eschew color. It’s just sometimes, I find, depending on the situation, color can be more of a burden than an attraction.

The full set can be seen here on my flickr account

SF, is a beautiful city and I would love to come back to try to capture it now. It’s funny, I used to go there every year, but this is really the first year I do see it with a different eye.

Well, I just realized it’s been about 2yrs since I was gun ho and wrote an article or a review of any kind. I figured one of my friends asked me how bokeh works in a photograph, and I thought hmm…that would be an interesting article to write about. So I figured I’d gear up to write it as soon as I get some equipment together.

Here are links to my past 4 articles that I have on greenbeanfx.com

200MM lens reviews

My experiences with prosumer bodies (note this was written in 2007)

Why I think one should hire a professional photographer for your event instead of Uncle Bob.

Thoughts on workflow

Expect one on Bokeh between lenses very soon!
I’ll do the kit lens vs a CZ 2.8 vs a 35mm 1.5 vs a 85mm 1.2
basically, how they compare and does one really need a super lens to get decent bokeh.

Well today was the first time in a long while that I actually got nervous before doing a shoot. I’ve never done a period piece before, so the probability of failure was slightly higher than normal. Then I got giddy because it’s been awhile since I got that nervous feeling before a shoot. I tried to get psyched up before we got into location. Guns and Roses was the obvious choice. I blasted Axl in the car on my way to the location. I am so stuck in the 80’s it’s not even funny.

The make-up portion went fine. I Wanted to thank Lisa Pilgrim, the MUA (Make Up Artist) for doing a fabuloso job. If anyone has make-up needs. You can contact her at lisa@makeupbylisap.com She’s about $50 an hour. Very nice, very professional, and most importantly, she seems to know her craft.

Nothing new on my end. I’ve done numerous makeup/getting ready shots for weddings. I guess the big difference is this one was done at 15:00, instead of some insane hour like 07:00.

The entire makeup set can be seen here

Now off to the shoot! This was taken at Orange Circle. Normally I don’t like to re-use locations. Simply because
a) I’ve done them before and they get boring
b) I feel it’s unfair to my clients I take them to the same spots as my other clients.

Though I’d say it’s due more to artistic boredom and needing variety, rather than professional courtesy to the client. However, I ended picking up the Orange Circle location simply because it was one of the two areas that had a less modern feel to it (Old town Tustin was runner up). The entire set can be seen here:

I was very fortunate to have a model that doesn’t flinch when the camera is nearby. She took direction well, and also brought a few poses and looks to the table. Nothing worse than someone that just stands there and says, “now what”. I did come away with a few things, and that’s where all the experimenting came about. I tried shooting into the sun. Something I’ve avoided doing because it’s hard to execute properly.

My weakness is with poses. I should of done my research, and it was my fault for not coming into the shoot with a bit more period stances. But I have problems with the human form in general. I totally suck when the arms are raised. So I tried having the model do some of those poses for more practice (They obviously never made it out of the cutting room floor, so I clearly need to still work on that).

Also I really need to be more aware of neck lines and wrinkle lines. There were a few shots that were good, but I realized I had the neck contorted in a way that made it look funny (at least to me, and I’m my biggest critic) so the image was just cut, or heavily cropped. I think that’s one of the biggest differences between this and event photography. In events, I just hunt or wait for the moment and snap. An experienced shooter in this area anticipates when moments occur and be prepared for it to happen. Whereas this is slightly more contrived, and shots are literally, “lets try this, lets try that, pose here, stand there”. I don’t often do that during wedding/event photography. So an experienced shooter in this type of shooting lies in the fact that they’ve shot hundreds of times, done all the poses and knows what works and what doesn’t for the varying body-types. Essentially reactive vs proactive shooting. Different styles, different skill-sets involved.

The shot above I ended up liking a lot after the fact. The lighting was perfect. Despite the fact that she looks more like a native American in this shot with the feather. Which is why we scrapped the feather on the head for the red dress.

“Through the looking glass”. One of my favorite shots of the day. It looks like it could come from the era.

So today they had this huge memorial/tribute for MJ. I guess how I found out he died was when we came out of a work meeting and my friend Danny checked out CNN and said, “hey dude, Michael Jackson just died”. I guess my first reaction was “no friggin way, so I had to check for myself”. So we spent the day blasting out his tunes in our office, and that was that. But my earliest memories were during the 80’s. We had pretty much barely moved to America, and my first glimpses of him on TV were when they played the “Billie Jean” videos where he was walking on those steps and they all lit up. All I remembered was the glowing sidewalk, in a really dirty city, (which I assumed was Los Angeles). I didn’t really understand why they lit up, and I always thought right in the beginning of the song, MJ said a bad word! They lyrics are as follows: “

“She was more like a beauty queen from a movie scene
I said don’t mind, but what do you mean I am the one”….but to me, the way he sang “don’t mind” sounded a lot like I said ‘do ma’, which is pretty much a really bad word in Vietnamese, so every time he said that I was like wooooo, he said “do ma”. I was a young Vietnamese kid who was in ESL, and English was a second language, so I guess the only thing I recognized were English words that sounded like Vietnamese words, and haha.. “Do Ma” was definitely one of them (which translates to F’ yer mom’).

Then comes Halloween. Well, my first Halloween costume. We couldn’t afford anything so my mom put a big white sheet over me, and cut holes for my eyes, so I was a ghost. My brother on the other hand got to be MJ. He got this glove, and it was so ghetto, we had to use elmer’s glue to put together the sequins. Then when the “Bad” album came out, we had purchased the tape. (Ok, for younger blog readers out in the world, tapes (aka cassettes) were what we listened to. They usually have two sides (A and B), and often times if your tape player sucked, the tape would get caught and would get all messed up. So you’d roll it back in, and hope it doesn’t sound too funky after wards. Pretty much google walkman. Anyways, I digress…So I would take my brother’s “Bad” tape and listen to it on my Walkman at night before going to sleep, and I’d imagine myself singing those songs to countless adoring fans. I guess it all sounds so silly now, and it’s strange. I guess some people still consider race something of a barrier he broke, and I guess coming from an 1st generation immigrant family, race to me really wasn’t that big of an issue. I didn’t even understand it. He wasn’t black, white, red, or yellow. To me, he was just a badass dude that sang. Oh and the one dude that said “do ma” on national TV.

Thus far, I’ve covered, straight and gay weddings, babies (no births yet), kids, sports, still life, landscapes, portraits… but one area that I get nervous about, are funerals. I am starting to get much more comfortable doing them, and I guess it’s normal for Asian cultures to document them. The two that I’ve been to, thus far had a lot of photographers there. This time since it was a close aunt of mine, I volunteered to document it. Aside from weddings, funerals are the only event where family from far away really get together. I’ve always thought that the photographer at the funeral would be the most hated man present. It’s kinda of like having the paparazzi there during moments of grief, why on earth would you want to have your picture taken?! But I guess it’s not so bad if you do it right.

I went with a very non traditional approach. I hung out in the back like a fly int he wall, used no flash, and just scanned the room for important people (eldest sons, the widow, close family members), and took candids to basically document the event as I saw it. No walking down the aisle at the church, flashing all over the place, interrupting people. I thought that would be very rude, so I did end up getting a lot of the backs of people’s heads or the side. There were some moments that were just too sad, and I felt it would dishonor everyone if I was just snapping away. In hindsight, looking back, I was thinking man, they would of been some fantastic emotional shots, but there comes a point where there’s a trade-off between what you actually want, and what think should be morally correct.

But as I look back at these photos, I really just can’t be impartial. With my parents getting older, I do feel that within the next 10yrs, I’m going to be in the exact same shoes as the people in the funeral party, so it’s generally an emotional and taxing undertaking to document these events. One thing I did learn from this though. Always, always have a wide angle lens handy! You never know when you’ll need that one shot. The problem is unlike weddings, where you have the luxury to some extent of bringing more year, you’re limited to what you have on your person. Switching or going back and forth, and like with most ‘events’, you’re liable to miss an important shot. So for beginners, I’d suggest one very good zoom that’s relatively fast. (an aperature of 2.8, or something with IS (or VR in Nikon-speak). However, remember image stabilization ONLY attempts to mitigate your own shaking and movement. Not other people’s shaking and movement. A common misconception is you can take low light pics with a lens and use IS/VR as a crutch, but remember other people, mainly your subject, will be moving as well, so it doesn’t matter how much shake you can stave, the outcome most likely will be blurring of the photo. My general technique for that is to tuck my arms in and lock them, hold my breath, compose, and shoot.

“The Funeral Party”

Two pale figures
Ache in silence
Timeless
In the quiet ground
Side by side
In age and sadness

I watched
And acted wordlessly
As piece by piece
You performed your story
Moving through an unknown past
Dancing at the funeral party

Memories of childrens dreams
Lie lifeless
Fading
Lifeless
Hand in hand with fear and shadows
Crying at the funeral party”
  -The Cure

A few of the shots that I liked from the baptism. Anyone out there in Southern California who has kids or relatives that are getting baptized and wants to dish out some dough for pics, let me know! =)
Basically a 2 camera setup. A 1DMKIII and a 1DMKII, fitted with an 85L 1.2, 35L1.2, and switched off between the 200L 2.8. I really should of brought the 70-200, but wanted to travel light and not draw too much attention to myself.

The entirety of the set can be seen here on my flickr.

I’m a sucker for kids hands, I always try to keep an eye out for shots like these. Sometimes you get them, some times you miss them. The trick is to always have the camera ready so you literally just aim, compose, and shoot when they occur.